Clinical AI oversight, powered by vetted human reviewers. Audit-ready documentation. Specialty-matched. Scalable.
States are moving fast on clinical AI regulation. California, Colorado, New York, and Texas now require human oversight of AI-generated clinical recommendations before they reach patients. The mandates are clear. The infrastructure to comply with them is not.
Most health systems are solving this with internal committees: slow, expensive, and difficult to scale across shifts and specialties. The alternative is a platform purpose-built for human-in-the-loop review of AI outputs, staffed by qualified reviewers, with audit trails that satisfy regulatory requirements.
When your clinical AI system produces a recommendation that requires human oversight, the system posts a review task. A qualified, specialty-matched reviewer evaluates it, documents their assessment, and returns a structured result. The entire interaction is logged.
Review costs are funded before the task is posted. No surprise invoices. No budget overruns.
Average review completion under 2 hours for standard cases. Urgent review tiers available.
Every review generates a compliance receipt: who reviewed, when, what they assessed, and what they concluded. Exportable for regulatory audit.
Reviewers are credentialed and matched to the clinical domain. A radiology AI recommendation is reviewed by someone with radiology training, not a generalist.
If your health system is deploying clinical AI and needs human oversight that scales, we should talk.
Contact us